‘Imago’ Director Déni Oumar Pitsaev On Winning Two Awards At Cannes

When Chechen-born filmmaker Déni Oumar Pitsaev came to Cannes with his new documentary Imago, he felt very uncertain about how it would be received. After all, it’s a personal story and it’s set in a place far from the experience of most people – a remote enclave in a corner of Georgia called Pankissi, very close to the border with Chechnya.

But Pitsaev has received the kind of validation in Cannes that filmmakers only dream of, winning two prizes: the L’Oeil d’or for the top documentary at Cannes, and the jury prize at Critics Week.

“I didn’t expect it at all,” Pitsaev told MyRumors Friday after the L’Oeil d’or announcement. A day earlier, he shared similar sentiments after winning the French Touch Prize of the Jury from Critics Week. We spoke on the beach at the Plage Miramar as high winds whipped waves in the Mediterranean a few feet away.

“For the moment, it’s like an adrenaline rush,” he commented. “It’s going to be a big help for the film for sure. I mean, my producers, they’re happier than I am for the moment.”

Imago begins with the filmmaker contemplating what to do with a plot of land his mother has given him in Pankissi. Should he sell it? Build a house there? If he goes the house route, what kind should he build? For Pitsaev, who lives in Brussels and Paris, dealing with the Pankissi property involves returning to a place of some painful memories, and reengaging with complicated family dynamics.

When Déni was only a few months old, his mom left his dad, and mother and child moved to Kazakhstan, “defying Chechen tradition that dictates divorced women must leave their children behind,” as Pitsaev writes in a director’s statement. “My grandfather forbade her to return home, but she refused to abandon me.”

After his grandfather died a few years later, Pitsaev and his mom moved back to Chechnya. He grew up in the ‘90s in a chaotic time for the former autonomous Soviet republic, as Chechnya tried to assert independence from Russia.

“We had two wars. The first war started in 1994, and I was like eight years old or something. It’s my first experience with war,” Pitsaev recalled. “When the second war started, it was a few years later in 1999 after Putin arrived in power in Russia… [Starting] the war in Chechnya, it was his first move, actually. And we forget about this; what’s happened in Ukraine today, it didn’t come from nowhere. It was already there 25 years ago.”

As Russian bombing devastated parts of Chechnya, Pitsaev and his mother moved to St. Petersburg. But as a Chechen, he became an immediate object of prejudice.

“It’s a really strange thing because you’re still a child and you are innocent. You’ve done nothing wrong and you are a victim of what’s happening. It’s not Chechnya who invaded Russia. It’s Russia who invaded Chechnya and it’s Russian bombs killing the people inside of Chechnya,” he said. “When you’re in Russia, they hate you. But for what? I mean, it’s like schizophrenic. You don’t understand. You are a victim.”

His mother encouraged him to change his name to something more Russian sounding: Andrey Andreyevich.

“It was a traumatic experience as a child to change my first name and last name,” he recalled. “It was like a Russification of my name to protect me from the harassment in school and not to be bullied — not only by children but also by teachers. The teacher in school would say, ‘Why we don’t stop the war in Chechnya now? It will be easier if we drop an atomic bomb there.’ And then you’re terrified and you are thinking, ‘Does the teacher know that I’m from Chechnya?’ You are so scared, and you feel, oh, maybe someone will know. Or maybe my accent will be wrong. You try to do better so your Russian is perfect. It’s quite a terrible thing, actually.”

For Pitsaev, going back to Pankissi meant facing the strictures and conformity of a quite traditional society. In his director’s statement, the filmmaker writes, “I cannot return to Chechnya today. For political reasons, the land of my childhood is closed to me. It exists now only in memory—a place of freedom and loss. My mother’s gift of land in Pankissi felt like a bridge to that unreachable past, but it came with expectations: build a house, start a family, grow the clan. Become ‘a Chechen man.’”

In the film, Pitsaev is constantly asked when he’s going to get married. And when he shows family members the design for the house he wants to build – a modern A-frame, elevated from the ground — they react with a degree of alarm. Both he, a single man, and his house would stick out.

Pitsaev’s father appears in the film – a genial man who remarried and has two teenage sons with his new wife. Pitsaev tries to confront perhaps the most painful memory of all from his childhood – why his father didn’t come for him. There is no simple answer to that question. Traditions and expectations of masculinity bear on his dad’s decision to stay away.

“My approach was kind of gentle with them and it’s not a big clash in the film,” he said. “I didn’t want to make too much drama, because the film is all about the things we say and especially the things we don’t say, and about the silence — almost like secrets, going around things, always playing with them, playing with the words, what we say in words and what we say by our body movements, like body language.”

Pitsaev tells MyRumors he’s now at work on a narrative-fiction film. Imago, meanwhile, will be released in cinemas in France in late October.

“We’re more than happy that people can see the film on a big screen as it was planned,” he said. “All of the images and also sound, all the work we did, it’s done for cinema theater to have the full experience.”

Pitsaev added, “For international sales, we’re dealing with Beijing-based company Radiance. And we hope they will bring the film all over the world. But yeah, we’ll for sure have a New York premiere soon as well.”